Das Cabinet des Caligari (1920), directed by Robert
Weine, can be called a piece of from the expressionist movement in Germany,
which had a rise in style around the time of the First World War. With
Expressionism, the focus of the film is to evoke a mood, through disturbed
imagery rather than to give a realistic account of a plot and the theme is set
around the distorted reality conveyed by the set design and cinematography of
shadows. It is meant to raise doubts and create a mood for the audience that
unsettles them. It is believed to be the first horror film, and is responsible
for making many tropes that are still present in modern film.
'The actors inhabit a jagged landscape of sharp angles and
tinted walls and windows, staircases climbing, crazy diagonals, trees with
spiky, grass that looks like knives.'-Roger Ebert (2009)
As Roger Ebert, film critic of Siskel & Ebert fame
observes of the film uses this unique imagery to exploit perspectives, shadows
and a minimalistic art style, which plays a part through the main portion of
the film. The film has a differing point of realism, as the setting of the
beginning is very naturalistic but with a withering landscape. The town is in
decay and all characters seem distant.
'The fantastic nature of Francis' story is shown in the
transition between the hospital and his vision of the small town Holstenwall.'-
Rachel Freeman (2006) What this shows, as Rachel Freeman points out in her fantasy
and dream writings of the film, that when he starts to tell his story
it begins to fade to the main setting of film which based around painted
sets that strikes the mood of being enclosed, narrow and imposing with twisted
perspectives positioned to stretch on until the distance and angles,
juxtaposing to the sets being based outside. This whole section is
presented in flashback through the main characters point of view. The whole
film makes a point of delving in each time a discovery is made, to think again
and carries on when it might be over until there is sense of distrusting the
point of view of the characters. It drives at the
audience psychologically, thus making Francis, the seeming protagonist, an
unreliable narrator.
When watching the film, the audience is introduced to
Francis who tells the story. Told from his point view, the character of Dr.
Caligari has a sinister screen presence, being the focus of many close-ups,
giving foreboding gestures and expressions, as well as Cesare, capturing
narrow shots and the shadows of his face for startling contrast. Though
spending the film trying to hunt down Dr. Caligari, it is revealed Francis is
subdued and considered as a mental patient by characters he interacted with
earlier. Roger Ebert makes a point in his review saying ‘Wiene is fond of the
iris shot, which opens or closes upon a scene like an eye. This makes the point
that we are looking and are privileged to witness events
closed to other people. He also sparingly uses a device of superimposing words
on the image to show Alan feeling surrounded by voices. Wiene's closeups lean
heavily on Caligari's fierce and sinister scowl, the dewy innocence of Jane,
and the wide-eyed determination of Alan. The Somnambulist is not very
expressive -- he certainly lacks the charisma of Frankenstein's monster, who in
a way he inspired -- and is most often seen in long shot, as if the camera
considers him an object, not a person.’ After the film returns to the present
and presumably reality, the changes in character portrayal is noticeable. Caligari
has changed, looking closer to a professional than his other warped self. Cesar
is part of the asylum, alive and awake, walking back and forth in a daze,
holding onto a flower, symbolizing his captivation for Jane. In presenting this
twist, the audience is unable to tell for certain if it is a deception or truly
the reality of this world.
Das Cabinet des Caligari has shaped modern film in terms of being one of the first of this
style, creating iconic images and stylistic choices that can be seen in every
shot. In the scene of Cesar enters to murder Jane, shadows looked as though
reaching down like knives or like fingers which could represent Dr Calgari’s
control over Cesare and Cesare’s wanting of Jane. It has a dream-like quality,
which is represented from Francis’s neurotic from of mind, as explained in
source 3, ‘The heavy visual imagery latent in dreams provide clues into the
minds unconscious. Francis’s portrayal of his delusion is very akin to a dream
in that the visual imagery is rich and fanciful, like a dream, with distorted
shapes and shadows.’
Bibliography
Source 1, Roger Ebert, 2009 The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari film review http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-the-cabinet-of-dr-caligari-1920
Source 2, Rachel Freeman, 2006 Fantasy and Dream work in The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari study http://courses.washington.edu/freudlit/Freeman.Caligari.html
Source 3, The Historical Evolution of Fear and Scare Tactics study of The
Cabinet of Dr. Caligari http://fearincinema.umwblogs.org/silent-films/abnormal-psychology/the-cabinet-of-dr-caligari/
So 'Caligari' didn't put you off of CAA, then? I'm impressed by your observation of the subversive, indirect storytelling of the environments, complimenting the actions and motivations of the characters. 'Caligari' is a bit of a slog when you're not used to silent cinema, but you can't say it isn't a rewarding film!
ReplyDeleteA really insightful and thoughtful review Zoe :)
ReplyDeleteJust a couple of quick pointers - don't forget to italicise your quotes, so that it is clear to the reader what has been said by you and what by another author. Your reference after the quote should just be the author's surname followed by the page (if there is one) and the year...so for example ( Ebert, 2009). Have another look at the Harvard method, for details on what you need in the bibliographical reference. Look here -
http://community.ucreative.ac.uk/Harvard-Referencing
You should also include some images/film stills... this will give you another way to direct your analysis, as well as breaking the big block of text up, and making it more visually appealing to the reader. Images also need to be referenced using the Harvard method.
All-in-all a very good start :) I am looking forward to reading your next review!