2001: A Space Odyssey, Director: Stanley Kubrick (1968)
This essay will discuss the meanings and thoughts behind 2001: A Space Odyssey. As a film which
has notable acclaim, it still divides audiences, who may be taken in by the how
the film looks in the cinematography, beyond to the deeper meaning behind
certain moments, whereas the rest of the audience may be put off by the slow
pace of the film, which leaves the audience expectant but unsatisfied when
tension is built up but goes on building. Like many of the long zooming shots
of space crafts, which take up a few minutes of screen time, the director
Stanley Kubrick challenges the viewer and establishes his dominance over
expectation. This quote from the Guardian review of the rerelease of 2001: A Space Odyssey by Peter Bradshaw
can explain some of the theories the viewer may have of the film as a whole: “Maybe only rocket science and deep space
could absorb Kubrick’s famous coldness and control and tendency to visionary
gigantism. It has become customary to place 2001 in a challenging or dark or
dystopian sci-fi tradition... actually, 2001 doesn’t exactly fit that first
camp either: something in its mandarin blankness and balletic vastness, and
refusal to trade in the emollient dramatic forms of human interest and human
sympathy.” (Bradshaw, 2014)
Kubrick can be described as an auteur director, as many of
his other projects such as The Shining (1980) have the same detail of focus to
symmetry into compositions, as well as lighting and simplistic design. Symmetry
has effect, such as when one of the focus characters, Dave walks down the
tunnel of his exploration spaceship. The tight and constricting area is set
into a octagon and shoot with white light so it almost glows, and has the
effect of conveying perfectness and control which lends itself to unease, which
is the embodiment of the state of control the character of the HAL 9000 has in
that section of the film.
The film raises a number of symbols that tie into the climax
and ending including the large monolith or monoliths that appear multiple times
in the film, the foetus that appears in Space looking over Earth and the scene
of the focus character Dave in the Victorian-style luxury house, looking at himself
aging and dying. There is little explanation to the significance of these
objects, but it is presented so that the audience cannot help question the
meanings of film or whether there are any deeper meanings at all. Symbolism of
rebirth, evolution and the control of God and the unexplained mysteries of the
universe can be called into question and in analysis of audience reaction to
the considered confusing nature of the film and for points that are never
expressly explained the film, Film Critic Roger Ebert writes on his website, in
regards to the bedroom scene “My
intuition is that it came out of Kubrick's imagination; that he understood the
familiar bedroom would be the most alien, inexplicable, disturbing scene he
could possibly end the film with. He was right. The bedroom is more
otherworldly and eerie than any number of exploding stars,” (Ebert, 1968)
which could mean that Kubrick wasn’t trying to convey realism but metaphoric
expression of otherworldly phenomena.
The monoliths seem to spark a connective link to the prehistoric
and the future as well as thoughts on infinity and could symbolise as the
desire to evolve, as well as knowledge, power and discovery, as the many
creatures and Humans that come into contact with it are drawn into discovery. As
in the novel based around and written for the film by Arthur C. Clark, who
worked with Kubrick on the film, the monoliths are described as ancient alien
technology which monitors the progression and helps develop the evolution of apes
into man. In an article for the Hollywood Reporter, a review of the film talks
about the meaning behind the final scene: “The
entire sequence can be accepted as an allegory of the act of conception. At one
point during the liquid churnings of a tailed white spermatozoic blob thrashes
toward a distant ova shape. Dullea, now aged, lands his space pod in a bedroom
whose illuminated floor and walls reveal Louis Seize decor, Empire furnishings,
romantic paintings, a womb expressing timeless comfort and personal taste. He
sees the alien as himself, and an older, dying figure in his likeness on a
deathbed, one arm lifted in supplication or farewell toward the towering
monolith. The figure is replaced by a perfectly formed starchild, an aureoled
fetus looking beyond this solar system, forming an infinite trinity in the
heavens with the arc of the moon and Jupiter, reborn, innocent and aware.
Appropriately, all the evidence of transitory technology is absent, leaving
only man's vision, perpetuated in eternity.” (The Hollywood Reporter,
2014)
Bibliography
Sources:
Bradshaw, P.
2014
2001: A Space
Odyssey review – still after all these years
Ebert, R.
1968
"2001" –
the monolith and the message
The Hollywood Reporter,
2014
2001: A Space Odyssey
1968 review
Images:
Film Poster
2001: A Space
Odyssey
Film Still, figure 1
2001: A Space
Odyssey
Film Still, figure 2
2001: A Space
Odyssey
Film Still, figure 3
2001: A Space
Odyssey
Film Still, figure 4
2001: A Space
Odyssey
:) Well-written, Zoe!
ReplyDelete